Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. Moriaga, S.C. no. 20–1573 (June 15, 2022)
All in PAGA
Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. Moriaga, S.C. no. 20–1573 (June 15, 2022)
Kim v. Reins International California, Inc., Cal. Supreme Ct. no. S246911
Huff v. Securitas Security Services USA, Inc., 23 Cal. App. 5th 745 (May 23, 2018), review denied (Aug. 8, 2018): a broad interpretation of the scope available to PAGA representatives in Labor Code-enforcement actions.
Raines v. Coastal Pacific Food Distributors, Inc., Cal. Ct. App. 3d Dist. (May 22, 2018): PAGA actions to enforce Labor Code section 226(a) do not require a showing of actual injury; actual injury is only required to secure actual or statutory damages under section 226(e), but is not required to prosecute an enforcement action to secure an employer’s compliance with the Labor Code
Court of Appeal holds that PAGA notice that failed to state existence of other aggrieved employees was defective and was a basis on which to grant summary judgment.
Fourth District Court of Appeal holds that civil penalties under Labor Code section 558 include both the default civil penalty plus underpaid wages.
Julian v. Glenair, Inc.: Court of Appeal paves the way for enforcement of post-dispute arbitration agreements in PAGA cases.